安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题






Is the update something we could maybe look forward to in the future (no pressure on delivery) ?
Subsidiary question : since you've mentioned "Reclaim Britannia", would it make sense to include something similar regarding the ("collaborative") reformation of the "Wendish Empire" in this mod ?
Thank you very much for creating and sharing your high-quality CK3 (and CK2!) mods with us.
A suggestion for a future update: perhaps you could make it so that even if you faith only controls 2 holy sites you can still reform and same thing with only one holy site but it would require exponentially more piety
You may have to redo this every time I update, though, unless you copy files out to your own mod and edit them there.
I've looked over the patch notes and I don't EXPECT any compatibility problems running the current version of the mod with 1.6, but obviously no way to tell in advance.
I do plan an update this week anyway (I'm planning on revising Dismantle Papacy along the lines of Reclaim Britannia) but I may not have time to do so before Thursday - again, we'll see.