安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题






(Hold the corridor)
Reach for Elbe's shore
It's the end,
the war has been lost
Keeping them safe
'til the river's been crossed
Nicht ein Schlacht,
ein Rettungsaktion
Holding their ground
'til the final platoon
"Hurry up,
we're waiting for you"
Men of the 9th
and civilians too
Dispossesed
surrendering to the West
is that because i have armed civilians?
i tried move all units to village and radio about 4 times
Try to save Berlin in vain
It's a road through death and pain
On the other shore, there's the end of the war..."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sQS9rkxtr18
Again my many polish friends know this is true but who could dare acusing them with his history of survival against all odds with two giants trying to destroy them once and again...
Otro saludo para Polonia
Each time you answer he is going to insult you... Don´t matter if your argument is correct or not...
Let it be... And center your efforts in @Carrot´s scenario improvement....
Un saludo desde España.
The Nazis, the Soviets, and the Red Army beg to differ.
"killed several million german prisoners under stinky jew eisenhower comand"
Firstly: even if that horse$hit WERE true it wouldn't make them the most brutal animals in the world, because you'd still have the IJA and its ilk doing all of that and worse in China.
Secondly: then why did German POWs in American camps have such a higher survival rate than those in Soviet ones?
I do love the soupcon of retarded Jew Hatred though.
Translation: You're *Boasting* about how you won't read most of what I wrote, let alone try to understand so you can refute it.
But you're going to call it '♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥" anyway>
And you want to claim I AM the stupid one?
Oh by the way: that should be "won't" not "mont."
"haha you brainwashed ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥"
Again: Bacque loving blockhead accuses others of being brainwashed?
"yours country hide all archives of american war crimes in ww2"
Ah, conspiracy theorist tier ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥. Because apparently you think the long reports of rape trials of GIs, carpet bombing, and so on were just hidden. In spite of them being largely open to the public. Purely because neither you nor Bacque can make the death rates of the Rhine Camps gel with your own fantasies.
If there are still some problems, I will keep fixing it.
Egotistical and ignorant is a poor way to go through life.
"gi not better then nazy same ♥♥♥♥ just scum"
Really now ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥?
Point me to a single time DURING WWII that the US "GI" inflicted anything comparable to the Siege of Leningrad on a city, starving the people out and FORBIDDING surrender.
You cannot. Because such a thing never happened.
The US GI was not a saint, but he was much better than the Nazis. Or for that matter the Red Armies.
"as you"
I'm not the smear merchant that can't provide proof, hack.
Absolute ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ that never happened. And which ironically is aped by both Neo-Nazi apologist idiots, and Soviet shills such as yourself.
The only source that claims Eisenhower was responsible for more than a million soldiers dying in the Rhine Camps is James Bacque. And James Bacque is a dishonest idiot and smear merchant. So that's something you have in common.
https://networks.h-net.org/node/12840/reviews/13498/shoptaugh-bacque-other-losses-investigation-mass-deaths-german
https://www.positionpapers.ie/2019/06/james-bacques-other-losses-a-deeply-flawed-book/
And there's more, but this is sufficient. Bacque was an utter idiot who read "Other Losses" to mean "Deaths" when it really meant "Other Losses", primarily those that escaped or were released on parole. Once confronted on this, he doubled down. Like you. Like idiots.
Wrongo fool.
Two key things; You're primarily talking about German POWs formally registered. And in that you're correct, for as far as it goes.
The problem is, it doesn't go nearly as far as you go, because besides possible summary executions or whatnot against German troops who were never registered (hardly beyond the pale given Nazi conduct towards Soviet prisoners and civilians), *MOST* of the Germans that the Soviets would've dealt with would've been civilians, not soldiers.
Secondly; "returned to GERMANY." In case you haven't freaking noticed, "Germany" even in 1932 was very different from Germany in 1946, so even Germans who had lived all their lives in East Prussia couldn't "return to Germany." Hence ethnic cleansing on a large scale as we see from the Benes Decrees and the Transylvanian and Galician operations of the NKVD.
It's ironic you're trying to use Goebbels's propaganda, because while Goebbels was a shameless liar and shill for mass murder, he was one with a method and rationale. He believed that truly effective propaganda had to have a core of truth to it (indeed the "Big Lie" was something he accused the British of doing).
He certainly lied about Allied and Soviet war crimes, but he could rarely invent them out of whole cloth.
Moreover, the German leadership DID NOT NEED to get their news from Goebbels, since they had access to secret documentation (Hence the difference between the propaganda figures of those the Nazis claimed died at Dresden versus the number they actually believed).
And that they caved so quickly when Eisenhower threatened to turn away refugees and troops approaching Western Allied frontlines because...reasons? Apparently the German military command KNEW They and their people had more to fear from the Soviets than they did the Western Allies. I wonder why that is?
You know what kind of people do that? Stupid morons and ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ who can't even defend their own claims. Especially those that rely on garbage claims like exaggerated death tolls from the US Rhine Camps.
http://marcuse.faculty.history.ucsb.edu/classes/133c/133cproj/08proj/Bacque1997Coon08z.htm
https://www.jstor.org/stable/40107116?seq=1
https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/germany-surrenders-unconditionally-to-the-allies-at-reims