安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
Specifically here, it would mean downgrading the highway between the offramp and the onramp to only be 2 lanes, so that the 3-lane highway ends up with 2 lanes for going straight and 1 lane for going off, rather than having the rightmost lane be able to do two things. And similarly at the merge point, a 2-lane highway plus the 1-lane onramp going to a 3-lane highway means no conflicts because all the incoming lanes have their own outgoing lane.
There is one small thing I don't understand: what do you mean by writing: "Lane Math'd", what does that mean?
Some minor tweak suggestions:
- it's great that the western interchange is Lane Math'd; you should do it on the trumpet in the start square too. (Maybe even have the roads into the start square just be 2-lane highways.)
- the most-southern branch of the river around the islands is a bit stop-start. I think it needs to be a bit deeper in the upstream part, or shallower over the whole thing to go more intentionally for the swampy feel on the whole channel.
- consider softening the terrain a bit around the western interchange.