安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
Whats wronng?
The LOD stills moving tho. Is that intended?
@Cago™² Oh no, I'm sorry xD They actually had a really subtle problem with the higher sway level before ... they had so few "joints" to keep triangles low that pieces of the tree would actually become slightly detached as it bent. It was barely noticeable but it drove me crazy so I turned it down until it totally stopped >_<
- What I'm probably going to do is update some of the existing pine scrubs to be more performance friendly, especially the bushes. I'm hoping to do that sometime within the next couple days. Releasing some more pine scrubs using the low tri template is possible, I'll have to see how well it works.
- I believe the vanilla trees range from about 300 to 1000 tris, so by triangle count these should all be considerably lighter. I think vanilla uses 256px textures, so these might be a bit bigger in that regard.
1. Are you planning on doing a Low-Tri version of the Pine Scrub? (Seems the tri range varies a lot, might now be worth your time but curious)
2. How does these compare to Vanilla Tree?
Great work - Love your stuff! Thanks for doing this.
Thanks guys!
or
four-FPS-friendly trees?
cuz I needz the 2nd one, haha.
Nice pack!