Sid Meier's Civilization V

Sid Meier's Civilization V

Grand Bazaar
17 条留言
kychkin 2017 年 8 月 19 日 下午 10:35 
doesn't load from subscription
is there are other way to try it
Venusaisha 2015 年 5 月 31 日 上午 12:44 
more money 8)
BaddestNewsBears 2015 年 1 月 5 日 下午 7:34 
Is there a direct download
Sisyphos 2014 年 2 月 10 日 下午 4:47 
Dis lyk sat won map from BF3
Modrian 2014 年 1 月 13 日 下午 7:15 
working fine now
Galgus 2014 年 1 月 9 日 下午 7:02 
It feels a bit overloaded, like it has too many traits on it.

Just an extra Trade Route is amazing: I'd probably reduce the gold gain from trade routes and remove the luxuries or vice versa.
regalmanemperor  [作者] 2014 年 1 月 9 日 上午 9:11 
check if it works now
Modrian 2014 年 1 月 9 日 上午 6:14 
Grand Bazaar initiation still results in loss of cityscape. By test, this also happens when AI builds it. Only wonder remaining I know of that this happens.
regalmanemperor  [作者] 2013 年 12 月 26 日 下午 10:16 
@mathew.pederson,

As much I hate walking in there as a 15 year old (who really likes maneuvering through crowds to see crockery and souveneirs for tourists? also for 5 hours ), It does a have cultural value, and had significant economic value centuries ago, but it should be updated soon
regalmanemperor  [作者] 2013 年 12 月 26 日 下午 8:19 
@mathew.pederson
can reduce the gold bonus to 4 gold
Delport Breckland 2013 年 12 月 26 日 下午 7:41 
The Grand Bazaar seems to be an East India Company clone worth 4 culture, 10 gold, a trade route and 2 each of 2 different unique luxuries. Considering that the main purpose of caravans is to produce gold, the bonus gold seems redundant. Why not remove it, and combine the culture and luxuries bonuses into a +1 culture per luxury resource type available in your Empire? This would make the variety of luxuries a key element, without adding additional luxuries (which can be a precarious balance), while (IMO) maintaining all the themes of your original version.

What do you think?
regalmanemperor  [作者] 2013 年 12 月 26 日 下午 6:38 
@mathew pederson, yup i know but it doesnt sound right to move ti into an era that is late, but at the same time they are powerful, so increased cost was an option, but il think of something else
Delport Breckland 2013 年 12 月 26 日 下午 2:53 
I would strongly suggest against increased production cost. Most wonders are priced according to their tech level. More powerful wonders are more advanced, and thus more expensive. Perhaps if you do not wish to reduce the power level (which is rather high), you might want to move it to a later technology?
regalmanemperor  [作者] 2013 年 12 月 25 日 上午 8:32 
I know that, I was thinking of increasing its production cost
Sapphire Bullets 2013 年 12 月 25 日 上午 1:19 
This looks really powerful, considering that you're getting +8 happiness from two unique luxuries on top of a bonus trade route (Which itself is going to get a bonus from the unique resource) and the other bonuses.

I'd suggest scaling it back to:
-2 copies of one of the resources (carpets would be my preference)
-Bonus Trade Route
-+4 Gold
-Free Market
-2 Great Merchant points
regalmanemperor  [作者] 2013 年 12 月 22 日 上午 12:33 
@BrenTenkage,
Having new stuff is awesome!
more wonders coming tomorrow(more than 1)
probably another will add a luxury (morrocan mint tea or persian rugs)
also a museum from Canada
BrenTenkage 2013 年 12 月 22 日 上午 12:22 
Now that is cool, I like having lots of trade routes (not to mention lots of wonders LOL)