unable to remove archeology sites from stars now as well

great work,i really hate the stupid Archaeological Sites bug

Hello, could you add a Russian localization?Otherwise, there's a bare code instead of text...
l_russian:

decision_mzilli_remove_site:0 "Удалить археологический объект"
decision_mzilli_remove_site_desc:0 "Этот археологический объект нам больше не нужен"
decision_mzilli_remove_site_tooltip:0 "Уничтожает археологический объект этого мира. Вступление в силу этого решения может занять день или два."

They fixed it lol. Updated to 4.0.

Thank you!

@Janlitschka Unfortunately 4.0 changed the planet interface so that Decisions can't be performed on unowned planets. :/ I'll try to come up with a workaround but in the meantime you won't be able to clear out archaeological sites unless the planet is one of your colonies.

Hey, how is the 4.0 Compatability? Thank you!

does it works for astral rifts too?

the idea of this is halarius out of context

can you make it so ai's will use these?

@joe.manuci Still works, as long as you own the system.

Since it's a planetary decision: What about not-colonized planets/asteroids?

@Shikoi Kurogami No, and that would probably break things since the archaeology events are tied to a site.

Is there any plans to automate destroying a completed excavation via a free edict that lasts until cancelled?

l_russian

i needed this

nice mod finally map can look more clean

Yes,yes it is,i made a mistake,my bad.

@MasterBot This version works with every version of the game. :)

3.10 version pls<3 and ty

Absolutely a must have. I've now had planets with a second, hidden site twice.

Love this mod!

How the hell does this mod has more subscribers than unique visitors!? LOL Good mod btw, it is good to pair it with Destroy Archaeology Sites WTF

It does not.

Has anyone checked if this desicion also destroys minor relic deposit on finished dig site?

@MaulMachine Any order is fine. :)

Does this have a preferred Load Order? Does it matter at all, or can I just drop it wherever?

thank you!

I mean they are visable, but having to go into a galaxy, click and find the planet and remove the sites from asteroids and barren worlds etc is a pain. Was just trying to make it easier :)

@Kraegor This is doable, but probably unnecessary since sites are visible from the galaxy map and thus easy to find.

@Láhʊsa Probably not, sorry.

Is this mod achievement-compatible?

Just a question... How hard would it be to add an edict or something (like they have for Gigastructures to find planets/suns etc) that can be activated to clear all Archology sites instead of having to go around one by one and clean them up? Just curious.

Thanks for update, king

A must have mod. Once you use it, it quickly becomes ESSENTIAL. You'll never want to play without it again.

my ocd thanks you

Thanks for this! =)

That would be a sweet option frozenparagon. Gonna try this now

@mzilli it works like a charm. i watched an ai controlled spent dig dissapear in real time after adding an ai weight of 10

Thank's, this let me remove a finished mod added site that was blocking another mod added site.

hrm, mayhaps i'll head over to distribute luxury goods and copypasta that ai weight onto your mod see what happens. i'll let you know how it goes if/when i do

@frozenparagon I've seen the AI use minor decisions like "Distribute Luxury Goods", not sure if it uses the more significant ones. I don't currently have anything in the code that incentivizes or prevents the AI from using this one.

@Omega: Certainly!

Good evening mzilli, I would like to include this mod in another mod that I've been working on. Would that be alright with you? I'd link credit for your work.

the hunt continues. does the AI ever use decisions? have you looked into having them remove used dig sites?

@frozenparagon Not sure, sorry.

this mod is an excellent QoL contribution. I'm trying to allow archaelogical sites to be excavated without system ownership. I'm curious if you know where that behavior is located in the files?

Thank you for making this mod.

thank you!

@Timrath Yes, and it should remain functional for all future versions.

Does it still work with 3.0?

thanks !!