安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题






poop
Much like a night out after too much drinking, some holes were enjoyable, some of them just didnt work, and some of them just felt like you never had a chance to even get to them.
The overall design philosophy was alright, but in practice had some questionable decision making for how it could represent those ideas. I really enjoyed hole 8 and hole 9, and despite not finishing hole 8 in the 50 stroke limit, I thought it was the best designed hole on the map. Many holes had flaws in their actual build that limited the potential of how the map could actually could play out, but Ill just leave that to rushed mapmaking and inexperience with practical map design.
3/10, could use more wide monky.
The monkey is looking at the hole that you have to go into it's just really hard to go inside because it's hard to tell if you went in or not