安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题






regions that belong to one of the 2 passes will now have an icon next to the region name
for easablity the norther route is the way to go.
All other effects seem to be working fine.
A suggestion: You could add a dilemma if a faction holds a full pass: decide whether to keep it fully open (% increase in tariffs income from trade factionwide, & diplomatic bonuses with countries you trade with), or keep it open only for your own merchants ( diplomatic penalty with all factions you trade with, % increase in buildings income factionwide). The first represents a trade-oriented faction benefiting from open trade, while the second represents a protectionist faction....
Huntsmarshall's Expedition isn't affected.
Skaven use other trade routes to the south, and Bretonnia mostly trades by sea.