安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
From what I've seen in TWWH2, as long as the settlement has walls, there is no distinction between the walls of a capital or a minor settlement. All siege maps use the same frameworks (walls, etc.). There would be no way to split what type of unit can attack which walls, etc. Either the unit has the ability to attack all walls or none. Same goes for climbing walls.
Kholek needs to be way larger, and "unable" to move through gates, but instead do great damage to walls, so that he needs to make a hole in a wall to enter a city rather then though the main gate.
Don't get why they insisted to shrink him down and only allow him to enter via gates.
Same for the Spiders for the Orc faction, why can't they just scale the walls witouth ladders?
Personally, I think that the author's choice of units is great.