安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
Why remove the vanilla african religion? Is it inaccurate? Does it represent any religion in particular?
I would be interested in adding more african religions to cover the whole of africa. Maybe you can point me in the right direction
You don't have to personally hold all the titles, you just have to control every barony, just like when forming Rome.
Namely it changes the Icon for Canaanite Religion and the holy sites for it are all shown as having no owners but being fully under Canaanite control so can more or less do an instant reformation without actually owning any religious sites.
Wondering if there is a way to get the Bloodlines, Dynasties and the like from this without getting the religious stuff.
@Artamere, yes, because it would really only be for that one county we didn't add it as a separate religion. Some aspects of it are incorporated into Amazigh, however, like the name of the reformed religious head.