Empyrion - Galactic Survival

Empyrion - Galactic Survival

SI - Hawk CX10 [T2]
32 条留言
bullmecha 2023 年 11 月 27 日 下午 8:56 
Apparently all the armor blocks were the forbidden block.. Replaced all the blocks and now it works. Thanks to Gothmar for helping me figure it out
bullmecha 2023 年 11 月 27 日 下午 4:22 
Was hoping to use this in vanilla but says it has a forbidden block in it :(
MoMo  [作者] 2022 年 8 月 21 日 上午 4:22 
1) bonne question, peut être qu'il faut des propulseurs plus puissants
2) Oui c'est possible il suffit de retirer le controlleur a munition et faire un lien entre les 2 soutes.
TonyMax.Fr 2022 年 8 月 19 日 下午 6:07 
Je viens d'essayer ce vaisseau, et bien qu'il a l'air super, il a deux défauts :
1) je sais pas si c'est une mise à jour qui a changé un truc, mais à vide dans l'espace (vanilla + poids) il ne dépasse pas les 116m/s / 130 max vers l'avant (juste les réservoirs pleins). Bizarre. A moins que je l'ai modifié un tout petit peu mais je ne crois pas.
2) ça serait bien de faire rejoindre les deux coffres extensibles en un seul gros (munitions), vu qu'on peut aussi l'utiliser comme coffre classique, non ?

En tout cas merci ^^ sur ma partie actuelle j'en ai deux, un pour le combat (celui-ci que j'ai testé) et un à peine modifié pour le minage rapide avec deux lasers de forage (pas encore testé lui, mais il me servira un jour ^^).
Lex69 2020 年 10 月 23 日 上午 8:44 
Thanks. I like it very much. I was using it with some modifications, and after the last changes that were made it is worth sharing. Blueprint is made for Reforged Eden scenario, any gravity planets.
https://psteamcommunity.yuanyoumao.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2265421272
MoMo  [作者] 2020 年 10 月 17 日 上午 9:53 
Yes mainly because of railguns, so with a small rework the amount needed is greatly reduced
Astrée 2020 年 10 月 17 日 上午 4:20 
Yes I know :-) But it needs erestrum-zascosium, and on reforged galaxy, it's really hard to find some. It's my next step, now that I can attack POIs with the CX10 ... :-P
MoMo  [作者] 2020 年 10 月 17 日 上午 3:52 
Do what you want @Astrée, there is also the Hawk CX15 (Tier 3)
Astrée 2020 年 10 月 13 日 上午 7:47 
Never mind, anyway it needs a T3 CPU, there's already a T2 inside. I'll take the constructor away.
Astrée 2020 年 10 月 13 日 上午 1:29 
Hi Momo,
I play with Galaxy Reforged, your Hawk CX10 is ok for it if we remove the constructor ;-)
I need to add a T2 CPU to be able to add a shield and upgrade the guns. Where would be the best location to add it ? Is there a specific location for this add ? I didn't find it.
Et au fait, merci pour tous tes modèles, ils sont superbes :steamhappy:
MoMo  [作者] 2020 年 6 月 1 日 上午 2:42 
Thank you @ukd777, I'm just waiting A12 to update all my ships, mostly CV. Hopefully, there aren't too many big changes for my collection.
alf 2020 年 6 月 1 日 上午 12:05 
works still very well in exp A12.4.1 , one of my fav ! thank you
MoMo  [作者] 2019 年 12 月 27 日 下午 1:18 
That's exactly what I tried to explain to Eleon before the public release. Many new players will be stuck because they didn't know about component conversion. And that's the worst thing about Eleon, you can warn them it's no use, until they kill their own playerbase.
Druckwelle 2019 年 12 月 27 日 下午 12:30 
Ok thanks Momo. Figured out myself already. Could be easier,Eleon...Have to find Sathium and Neodymium which isnt easy in my actual game.
MoMo  [作者] 2019 年 12 月 27 日 上午 10:58 
Thank you @Druckwelle, the new CPU extender (T2) need satium and Neodymium
Druckwelle 2019 年 12 月 27 日 上午 8:57 
Nice ship. Not many of these multirole ships to find these days which are cpu compliant and not to resource hungry. May i ask which of the ships components need the Satium and Neodymium?
Onset 2019 年 11 月 9 日 下午 3:54 
Thanks Momo
MoMo  [作者] 2019 年 11 月 9 日 下午 2:54 
Hi Onset, they are behind gatling guns. If you want to refuel : press P / main tab / Fuel section / Fill All (or manage)
Onset 2019 年 11 月 9 日 上午 10:53 
pardon my ignorance but i am having difficulty finding fuel tank
WildFire™ 2019 年 11 月 2 日 下午 10:29 
Yea O2 Tanks are the biggest necessary waste of reources in the this game at the moment, it should be only be used to a bare minimum and refilled as needed. Each time you put down an o2 tank your dedicating mass, cpu, blockspace and PU to an object that can only hold O2.
For instance, if you decided to put down a Cargo Box 1 (1x1) and instead put your O2 Bottles in it - you would be able to contain 10250 O2 instead of 400 from a single Small o2 tank. Itwould be 77x more energy efficient, 69x more CPU efficient and 13x more Mass efficient in comparison to the O2 tank if attempting to reach the same O2 capacities.
Point is, have 1-2 O2 tanks, keep your O2 bottles in containers and add/refill the tanks as you need it.
zippie989 2019 年 10 月 17 日 上午 1:21 
ah ok
MoMo  [作者] 2019 年 10 月 16 日 上午 2:58 
@zippie989, If it wasn't airtight, the temperature inside the cockpit would drop to -120° in space.
I don't think it's an air leak issue, but this ship has only one O2 container. If you want more you can use the shield slot.
zippie989 2019 年 10 月 13 日 下午 8:31 
this ship has an air leak its not air tight
Catwezel 2019 年 10 月 1 日 上午 3:52 
Nice, thanks for sharing Rate + :steamhappy:
Grimble Grumble 2019 年 9 月 28 日 下午 9:04 
I quite understand.
MoMo  [作者] 2019 年 9 月 28 日 下午 3:39 
Thank you Othobrithol. Unfortunately you have to sacrifice something if you want to increase the O2 capacity (RCS or Shield slot). You can create your own version if you want. I think one O2 tank is enough for a trip, you have a limited O2 consumption when you don't move. You can also store O2 bottles in the cargo ship, it requires more manipulation but it's still reasonable. Don't forget that the CX10 is a "transition" vessel.
Grimble Grumble 2019 年 9 月 28 日 下午 12:50 
Excellent design and detailing. One suggestion though: 400 o2 capacity is just not that useful. It's less than your suit holds. Given that large bottles contain 250 you can only load one from the get go. Adding a 2nd tank pushes it up to 800, so three bottles fit in easily and you can use the o2 station many times before needing to refill it.
MoMo  [作者] 2019 年 9 月 26 日 上午 11:09 
Thank you @jrandall & Kakarotto
Kakarotto 2019 年 9 月 26 日 上午 10:47 
Nice shape and simplicity, well showcased. Thanks for sharing. Regards.
jrandall 2019 年 9 月 26 日 上午 6:45 
Great looking ship with nice function and detail! Excellent work!
MoMo  [作者] 2019 年 9 月 25 日 上午 8:03 
Thank you Kithid, I'm still following your work ;)
Kithid 2019 年 9 月 24 日 下午 9:29 
Nice and elegant as always. Well done Momo!