商店页面
Opus Magnum
全部 讨论 截图 艺术作品 实况直播 视频 创意工坊 新闻 指南 评测

Opus Magnum

商店页面
Opus Magnum >  创意工坊 > Stupid Snake 的创意工坊 > GREEK FIRE
GREEK FIRE
描述 讨论0 留言20 改动说明
20 条留言
< >
Bambi 2020 年 8 月 25 日 下午 7:25 
Now that I think about it, the theoretical minimum could be slightly less than 40 if the triplex bonds for all 6 products were made before attaching the water atoms.
Bambi 2020 年 8 月 25 日 下午 7:01 
This is the best I could do for low-cycles: 790 / 43 / 178 [imgur.com]
Theoretical minimum is 40.
Psynixx 2019 年 9 月 25 日 上午 10:06 
going for speed: https://imgur.com/dAS7hAz
620/65/100
PentaPig 2019 年 9 月 17 日 下午 3:10 
There is no reason to use track. 110/675/50 https://i.imgur.com/HobCjKa.gifv

This was way more difficult than I expected. There are a lot of promising configurations for calcification/ duplication that get very close to working.
[p%%h]StaleWhiteBread 2019 年 9 月 16 日 下午 6:53 
I think I made the cheapest solution possible. 125/604/87

https://imgur.com/a/qtuioeM
Dizze 2019 年 9 月 5 日 上午 10:21 
I was finishing this and completely forgot that the input was of 2 air nucleus
https://i.imgur.com/H6Xvo1M.gif
Stupid Snake  [作者] 2019 年 9 月 4 日 下午 7:15 
@Alcator: Oh, I know. I was just describing the way it tends to fall out in my own designs--area and cost at the expense of time.
Alcator 2019 年 9 月 4 日 上午 8:58 
@Stupid Snake: That is actually natural - those criteria are working against each other. It's usually not possible to have both low cost and low cycles, or low area and low cycles.
To get "top percentile" in each chart, you need multiple different solutions for each puzzle.
Stupid Snake  [作者] 2019 年 9 月 4 日 上午 6:43 
Love those solutions. Mahashma, I have the same problem. In most of the main game puzzles, my solutions hit the peak or better on the histograms for size and cost...and do way worse than the peak on cycles, lol
jefkin 2019 年 9 月 3 日 下午 3:17 
330 / 128 / 88 https://imgur.com/a/3YoMQsl
Alcator 2019 年 9 月 3 日 上午 9:08 
My solution:
https://imgur.com/gallery/tI7ErEr
$:350/C:219/A:75
mahashma 2019 年 9 月 3 日 上午 1:13 
Because I couldn't leave it alone... https://imgur.com/a/o3Tnbop
370/209/93 and it likely has a lot of room for improvement; I tend to focus on size, so optimising for cycles is a new challenge.
mahashma 2019 年 9 月 2 日 下午 9:19 
Smaller! Cheaper! Fast...errrr... maybe nosomuch faster
140/554/27 https://imgur.com/a/tmGE6BB
mahashma 2019 年 9 月 2 日 下午 8:26 
260/299/38 https://imgur.com/a/XXen7QR :D
Stupid Snake  [作者] 2019 年 9 月 2 日 下午 6:48 
Alcator: Damn, that's fast. I want to see your solution.
vizthex 2019 年 9 月 2 日 上午 11:25 
@Alcator Where's the gif?!
Alcator 2019 年 9 月 2 日 上午 8:46 
Very nice puzzle, thank you!
$:350/C:219/A:75
vizthex 2019 年 8 月 24 日 下午 1:08 
@Stupid Snake Idk, but unless someone makes it smaller I suppose so.
Stupid Snake  [作者] 2019 年 8 月 24 日 下午 12:48 
vizthez--Nice! I wonder if that's as compact as it can get?
vizthex 2019 年 8 月 24 日 上午 8:16 
Nice puzzle! I made a 320/348/50 solution, so it was smaller than yours :D https://imgur.com/OEbAj0m