Im not sure, i migrated all my files to another SSD and I lost some. Ill see if i can fix it

is it ofline? it doesn't show up in my subscriptions anymore

alright thank you

No, it is controlled via remote but you can setup a targeting script if you want it to have that

if i launch this out of a missile silo will it start tracking right away and crash into the inside of the silo?

@Uncle Ho, I’m glad you like it!!!

honestly this torpedo is so fun to use

@Android how about instead of being a huge asshole, you just make your own missile? Like wtf dude??

Dear God; what the crap is up
with this "Android" guy's comments
on this thread?! They're so mean.......

@jonnyspeed Huh, that's really strange. Ill have to do some testing and find out why that is. Thanks for letting me know!

the decoy connectors, the things keeping the decoys on the torp.

@jonnyspeed, I'm happy to help! You don't mean the connectors on my torpedo right?

i have to grind the connectors down to 17% for the decoys to launch. its kind of annoying when i have a good shot lined up. But i have been looking for something like this on the workshop for over a year now, so thank you.

@flori1994, thank! I’m glad you like it!

very nice. i think i will use it as the vls missile on an x304

@Assassin1217 yes I definitely agree the sensor takes a while to trip. And when you’re making a missile that’s relying on sensors for detonation, every millisecond counts. I’m going to work on modifications this to accommodate a script for raycast detonation or something. Thanks for the comment!

Love to see the arms race continue. I agree with some of the previous posts regarding sensor detonation. In my own trails of missiles ive found the sensor refresh rate is really low, I forget thr esact number, but its like 10x slower than raycast or Lidar from a camera. Sadly you do need to use a script but it will bring your did count to 0%.
Keep up the good work!

@Android: all comments prior to my warning comment about the rules of the comment section will remain, anything that does not follow the criteria that I have set will be deleted

@Android: stop the childish behavior. You may post comments with feedback or constructive criticism for the blueprint only.

Hello everyone,

Please refrain from making disparaging remarks and hateful language towards anyone here. Only use this comment section from here on out for constructive criticism and feedback on the workshop blueprint.

I welcome discussion and input so long as it is not rude, disrespectful, or outright hateful. Name-calling and childish remarks are not tolerated. ANY comments made from now on that do not meet such criteria will be promptly removed.

@Author I highly recommend deleting and/or reporting these two comment spammers.
They are incredibly rude and childish and there is no reason to keep them here. If you do, feel free to delete this comment too

Jesus Christ. Tails, stop this juvenile BS. Stop clogging up the comments section of this poor man, both of you.

3.Last question, why you write comments that only contains "Nice, cool!" "Awersome!" without reasoning about the shortcomings and what needs to be improved?
P.S. "Haters" can give more profit to author than those who flatter him, if author accept criticism.

In my own honest opinion this torpedo have too bad warhead and a guidance system that is as old as the world.

As for me i haven't questions for author of this blueprint.
But have questions for those who like this "Torpedo".
1.I think that in steam workshop you like blueprints that cause you admiration and that you can't build. If it's true, why you can't build simple missile that controlled like drones (by remote control, antena and camera)? If you can't build missile like this - you newbie or not experienced engineer. As for me i think that this missile have simply design and type of controlling. It is neither beautiful nor destructive.
2.I think it’s not right to be biased towards anyone, and people that are call other people who criticize blueprints "Haters" more toxic than these same "Haters". Cause "Haters" can give constructive critisize to blueprint to improve to fix his flaws. Why you call them "Haters" and try to persuade the author not to listen to criticism?

And now I will explain to you the behavior: For such assessment work has to have 1. homing guided script 2. guided multiple warheads 3. a more powerful warhead. And for 63 likes I get IT. Now the question is,WHERE is IT.
I certainly gross and it may be wrong,BUT ISN'T it MORE RUDE to NOT PRAISE IS PRAISING a DECENT JOB?!

https://psteamcommunity.yuanyoumao.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1812881947&searchtext=
- It's a poorer job than that, judging by your exclamations,isn't it?

Stop doing that crazy grading thing and I'll stop acting like it.

You yourself are not annoyed that THIS blueprint was have more likes than for example the script Diamond Dome?
Personally, I think you do not care,whereas I do not agree with this position. And to blame everything on the fact that I'm a fool and do not give criticism(which is a lie) is the real stupidity.

It is logical that I am annoyed by the fact that different noobs get the same or better rating than much more decent work. If you want,I can give you examples for the hundredth time.

@Epic Tails I see we have a gathering of noble maidens. I would have behaved more modestly if you had not approved of such publications on a permanent basis. But you don't care who gets the grade,do you?

@Blackvertigo I’ve put some more thought into it, and I think I’ll try and make an actual synaptic missile. Sounds like fun

@CrimsonAdder Usually I do condense it into two
comments, unless of course like in this situation I
have a lot to express.

@Epic Tails, thank you for that, I really appreciate it! I’ve uploaded a few things but this is really the first of its kind. I’d love to hear what you think about it and what I can improve. Thanks again!

android is always like this, it's to be expected really

also tails, can you try to condense things into one or two comments in general

Continue to upvote in workshop shit like this.
-_-

Such mechanism on script useless too againist moving targets.
You play a game where the ships can change the trajectory in seconds,it is very naive to make ballistic missiles with ballistic decoys against them.

@CrimsonAdder, thanks for the feedback! I’ll consider adding more decoys to increase its chances, and perhaps I’ll look more into adding a script to it. I’ve definitely been having trouble using the sensors for detonation, maybe the raycast will help! Thanks!

@Android, I’m sorry it didn’t work well for you. I’m interested to know how many point defense weapons your target has? Granted, the decoys only work as long as they are alive. So the more weapons the target has, the shorter the decoys will live.

For moving targets, it’s best to follow the same flight path i.e. fly parallel or directly behind the target and then converge.

Also using raycast camera to arm the warheads with Easy Lidar Homing is reliable unlike the sensors, which often lead to duds.

it typically takes at least 8 decoys to distract turrets long enough for the missile to impact a stationary target in my experience.

To the author, I would recommend increasing the number of decoys and using Easy Lidar Homing in GPS mode instead of manual guidance, which would make the missile practical.

one of the most useless torpedoes and even 4 decoys did not save it from a normal missile defense,which it will not survive as a small grid

useless for moving target and no point against the stationary

@Carl yes! Thanks for letting me use it! You should make a ship that carries this as a payload.
@Blackvertigo1, yes tons of fun! And I totally agree, I don’t think it does nearly as much damage as it should. Keen needs to up the damage of small grid warheads imo. And I’ve played around with rotors, but it can’t be printed, that’s why I opted away from that

Synaptic missiles are FUN...

Needs more umph mini missiles though, maybe on rotors with small grid missiles?

Nice and you even used the clip of my roicewager as a test dummy lmao. gonna try this for my newest battle carrier I'm working on.

@PuggerBoi, thank you!

@Psycho i love this blueprint its cool

@Northerner, thank you! I know it’s probably not super cost effective to make haha, which is why I really hope keen bolsters the damage of warheads so it will actually be worth it. And thanks! I’m pretty happy with the way it came out. Suggestions for improvements are always welcome!

it does more damage per amount of magnesium than anything else, anything but that if you point your drills at anything for more than a second then you'll basically have enough to make it.

I think its cool, but I always find weapons like this underwhelming for the amount of damage they due vs cost

but its super cool, and I really like the idea of decoys as well. Good work man.