安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题






Will play them for sure, keep up the good work!
1. This scenario is about management of losses, not dealing damage. Keeping planes on the ground to preserve them and conserve your forces.
2. This fits well into the campaign. The United States needs a reason to join the campaign. Taiwan needs to show they need support but that they can also contribute to the war effort.
3. It's accurate to the situation in the Taiwan Straight. China is overwhelmingly superior in the realm.
I understand that you may not enjoy this type of scenario as much, but I hope that you will play later missions in the campaign as they will be much more competitive.
SSM strikes will almost never reach enemy ships because of the chinese air superiority and your own naval forces are a joke - Sea Chaparrel, really?
For me this scenario is some kind of one sided turkey shooting - but with the difference, that the player is the turkey. If the aim of the scenario is to show how utter useless trying to defend against such an overwhelming force - ok. But this is no fun for me.
The author put a lot of effort in it and it is a really nice design - but more like a Kobayashi Maru, because you can never win that. At least from my point of view...