商店页面
Sid Meier's Civilization V
全部 讨论 截图 艺术作品 实况直播 视频 创意工坊 新闻 指南 评测

Sid Meier's Civilization V

商店页面
Sid Meier's Civilization V >  创意工坊 > NuclearConsensus 的创意工坊 > DuskJockey's Bulgaria (Vasil Levski)
DuskJockey's Bulgaria (Vasil Levski)
描述 讨论0 留言20 改动说明
20 条留言
< >
NuclearConsensus  [作者] 2020 年 9 月 16 日 上午 3:05 
UPDATED. Please check the change notes for details.
NuclearConsensus  [作者] 2020 年 1 月 14 日 下午 8:50 
UPDATED
NuclearConsensus  [作者] 2019 年 8 月 10 日 上午 2:08 
UPDATE: The text error with Mystras has been fixed, among other things.
NuclearConsensus  [作者] 2019 年 7 月 27 日 上午 1:21 
Thanks for bringing this to my attention. I'll fix it in the next update.
Akephalos 2019 年 7 月 20 日 下午 3:55 
Thank you for creating this mod! But when I play with it, the city state Mystras has a TXT_KEY error in their name. How can I fix this?
NuclearConsensus  [作者] 2019 年 6 月 16 日 下午 6:20 
@Tnesniv Yørel: I went for a more somber pink-on-green combo because I thought the original color scheme was too bright.
Tnesniv Yørel 2019 年 6 月 15 日 上午 10:01 
Question: why did you change the beautiful colors? There are already quite some brown-brown civs.
Spinach 2019 年 6 月 2 日 下午 2:18 
Bulgaria is just a myth
NuclearConsensus  [作者] 2019 年 6 月 1 日 下午 11:25 
@Thunder Fist Maki: The Opalchentsi's Combat Strength bonus is capped at +3 for both Nationalism and non-Nationalism versions.
Karma 2019 年 5 月 30 日 下午 6:06 
I assume there's a cap on the combat bonus, but I thought I'd ask; that could get really OP otherwise.
JEELEN 2019 年 5 月 28 日 上午 7:18 
Thanks, that worked. And sorry for the trouble!
NuclearConsensus  [作者] 2019 年 5 月 27 日 下午 6:16 
@JEELEN: Try this site: {链接已删除}
Simply plug the mod's URL into the field marked "Enter URL" and click Download.

Also yes, building the Rose Field on Marsh does indeed clear the feature. I apologize for the ambiguity in my wording
JEELEN 2019 年 5 月 27 日 上午 11:53 
@NuclearConsensus: Link's not working. Clicking my ass off, but nothing gets DLed.

P.S. The marsh thign may not be a çoding oversight'. The only improvements that do not remove the marsh are the Polder and the Fort. So, technically, building a Rose Garden on a marsh tile is perfectly valid.
JEELEN 2019 年 5 月 27 日 上午 11:41 
@NuckearConsensus: Unless they clear the marsh, I assume.

And thanks.
NuclearConsensus  [作者] 2019 年 5 月 27 日 上午 6:22 
Updated. Workers should no longer be able to build Rose Fields over Marsh tiles.
NuclearConsensus  [作者] 2019 年 5 月 27 日 上午 6:06 
@JEELEN: {链接已删除}

Also re: building Rose Fields on Marsh, that's actually a coding oversight. Thanks for bringing it to my attention.
JEELEN 2019 年 5 月 27 日 上午 3:08 
Cool.

@nuclearconsensus: Any chance of a direct DL link?
King Lugia 2019 年 5 月 26 日 下午 8:56 
they CAN be adjacent which is good because otherwise they would be not as great, which they currently are. the mod says it can only be built on grassland but I can build on marsh since that is on grass. so you can get a grassland marsh rose city going and it is the best. good work!
JEELEN 2019 年 5 月 26 日 上午 5:19 
@nuclearconsensus: Love the Rose Field (doesn't say if they can be adjacent). Would play if it weren't for YnAEMP v. 25, which totally messed up my UI... unlike v.24, which is perfect.
Hatemonger 2019 年 5 月 26 日 上午 4:28 
Can you do the Russian empire next under Tsar Alexander II?