安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题






Always available, Spectro.
What can be done is to build a mission on that basis and just add the RHS mod to your game, without even having to build something with just the RHS itself.
What's cool about it is to set up specific arsenal locations, such as the cages I put in that particular scenario, would give more visual possiblities, another thing would be to use the vehicles disabling them as elements of use and making them as scenery material.
So to build the whole scenario in itself neither does it compensate to implement the mods in the constructions.
Does RHS offer more resources? Why if it is to implement only the vehicles just insert the mod and create the mission! The scenario itself is static, has no scripts and no triggers, not even respaw from enemies or allies.
So far people have not complained but I'm worried about putting many mods to the players, laughter, sometimes I think I exaggerate so much that I'm thinking of putting a seal of quality: Low FPS Garantee.
You have a good feel of game design