安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题






(The reason your government changed when you gained a title is that's one of the [relatively few] times the game actually checks government conditions.)
in the feudal_governments file in Governments, I just added the nomination succession law under the potentials so that instead of requiring imperial elective, it's either imperial elective or nomination.
That the other traits work might have nothing to do with them being listed in the trigger. If I'm not mistaken all traits listed there have the "cannot_inherit = yes" line, which means they would disqualify their holder from inheriting anyway.
Deleting the dynasty requirement has no effect on which candidates are eligible. Same with adding requirements like gender (e.g. is_female = yes) or attributes (e.g a certain age). Whatever the game currently uses to decide which candidates one can choose from, the trigger requirement has apparently nothing to do with it.
Any ideas?