安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
7.7/10
Funny how | \_/ ()'s comment reminded me that there are only TWO surfaces ^^
P.S. the chamber is perfect as is, not too big or anything. It has kind of backtracking because you always go back and forth, but it wasn't annoying in the least!
Thank you
@GodDrane I would never use cube throwing in a puzzle. Two blocks high should be enough indication that it is unintended. I consider lifting a cube onto a one block high ledge acceptable, however, because it requires no dexterity.
Blind Run: https://youtu.be/8S8abR-_saA
@Edward_shooter I'm not sure what you mean. For all those who throw the cube up onto the ledge, that is unintended. I don't fix cube throws, I only fix cube lifting (raising a cube onto a 1 block high ledge). For anybody familiar with my style of mapping, you would know that I don't rely on tricks and dexterity as moves in a puzzle. This is entirely logical.
If my visual style confuses you, I apologise. However, I think it is naive to say that large maps inherently confuse players. Space management, while still being an important part to creating a puzzle, does not necessarily override layout and concise placement of elements.