安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
1 stroke pars should never happen, period. Unless you setup a course where the tee is on the edge of the hole with borders all around, so the ball can go nowhere but in.
Not only is Par 1 unrealistic to expect of an "average" (again, incorrect term, but it gets the point across) player, Par 1 also gives good or great players no scoring room to shine.
Similarly a course were a hole in one is obviously impossible, should rarely be Par 2, if it is going to take one shot to get a chance to sink the second shot, you are expecting perfect play, Par is not, an should never be, *perfect* play.
First, the primary issue seems to be unrealistic par estimates. Certainly reasonable for anyone who's played multiple times, but this course is far from intuitive.
Many pieces used for construction of courses are not executed correctly or lined up right (especially the curved half-pipe pieces). If the author would add 2 to the par on a number of holes, it would be reasonable, but this is ridiculous sometimes. Even conservative shots will end up out of bounds sometimes. Really don't think I'm being unreasonable, but this course could use adjustments.
Seems like the bounce pads are put there as a distraction on some, but the bounce pads aren't set right if they were meant to be useful on others. Even doing full power at the right angles will come up short on being a shortcut. Absolutely no point to some of these pieces except as a distraction to keep players from getting a better score.