安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题






For example: On a foe with 40 PA, 0 MA and 50 HP, dealing 19 fire damage will do 19 damage to HP and remove 19 PA. The enemy will be left with 21 PA, 0 MA and 31 HP.
I sincerily hope you will reconsider making this a priority :)
It's possible Windego was missed, however. I'm only aware the issue was fixed with Fire Slugs.
Think they'll play nice?
You flatter me! As for your question, you may wish to take my answer with a pinch of salt, but both are equally "balanced" since the AI gains similar benefits. It's up to you whether you feel physical and magical based attackers should have the same weight on armour or if you should need to work a bit harder to make hybrid parties work with 50% damage duplication.
I personally fall under the former category, but it's up to player preference. If you can't decide, I recommend trying out 100% first alongside the 30% armor bloat mod.
... Until 30 minutes ago, the answer was "yes", but times have changed.
Here you go.