安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
https://psteamcommunity.yuanyoumao.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1527522376
Note that it includes more than just reactors, as shields, thrusters, sensors and many other things didn't have numbers either.
Didn't notice these on reactors myself, and I think thrusters are missing tier icons as well, maybe sensors too...
Especially since Stellaris is a *grand* strategy game. Fiddling around with micromanagement stuff is non-grand.
I think more combat mechanics might be needed before expanding weapon types anyway, as all current ones seem to be well-covered by existing stuff, and I dare you to propose a weapon type within these which wouldn't be redundant with something already there.
(got this opinion when trying to come up with a role for hangars in my other mod, ending up making them into essentially more resilient missiles, every other niche I could find was taken)
It is an abstract visualization though, as indeed if it was simulation-like camera, there'd be no beams (except maybe in nebulas, where there's at least something to scatter from), definitely no red/gamma/x-rays (outside visible spectrum), and nothing in space at all that'd be larger than pixel-sized due to astronomical scale.
But since it is visualization, no excuse for not making it more convenient and pretty, which is the purpose of such things after all.
You can never have enough Quality in your Life, even if you are James Quall.