安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题






Its an old project back when I built this one. The design is close to 51 Peg, and 55 cancri
Went to the easiest.
Added 6 storage 320k (2 of each)
Added shield
Added CP T4
The Caudron (lower hangar) and Gorrila (outside docking) :-D
But it took the largest docking platform from upper hangar making finally the angled runway to be less "justified" to "exist"
So I removed the hole.
For this vessel, my main goal was class 7 with as much as possible space inside for SV/HV.
I did what I could then worked a little bit on the very basics for class 7.
For class 10, I mainly worked the lights, and especially the run way. (if you play with a friend, you will see that the runway plays really good with red and green lights.
Now, yes, I agree, I could and should do something about switches here and there.
I am thinking to "explode" this design into parts - rework some areas and give more details while trying to keep it under class 7. But for a finished vessel, although it may not look like a bit work, in fact it is.
And apparently, this carrier doesnt get as much success as my 51 PEGASI.
I dont know why - this one is pretty close speaking in term of design, but has a lot more work in it and use a better conception overall.
Taste and colours :-)
Thanks for your feedback
Small thing, but small things makes the difference. I would love to do more, but it would really raise up ship class.
Not sure if I can do those on class 7 version, but I will try
should be uploaded in the next 15 minutes
(outside very little changes)