安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题






The comment came off stating like a true fact that this war paint looked like something already in the game which I did my best to avoid while keeping true to my original idea. The comment felt "troll-y" in nature, but in the end it probably wasn't what you intended.
I understand how annoyed you must feel after you tried to make changes but find out people still think it looks too similar to the Night owl.
But deleting any criticism and calling them "Trolls" Isn't a good way to deal with it. Their not "Trolls" for having an opinion that differs from yours.
Obviously I updated and published the Splinterstrike before you left your little comment and discussion. In the time between your comment and mine on the SplinterSTRIKE today I didn't do anything to change or update the SplinterSTRIKE.
Then why did you say you "went back and updated the skin to avoid similarities to the Night Owl"?
It seems odd that you call me a "Troll" for saying it looks too similar to the Night owl when you then go back and "updated the skin to avoid similarities to the Night Owl."
Why update it if you consider my statement "simply not true"?
If you left a comment on my Splinterhex saying that it looked like the Night Owl, then I'd agree. I addressed making changes to that war paint on its workshop page, and my changes culminated in this current version.