安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题






Oh, and they're also about as cheap as MP40s, and while thats really cheap no one complains about that gun.
From my understanding these guns were manufactures from a single sheet of metal with only certain parts being precision machined metal while the rest were simply stamped
@Et Princeps It was cheap gun indeed, but it worked as a weapon system and plenty of soldiers used them so I guess they can't be half bad.
@A. Maxim. You should see the differences between the base texture maps and theses then XD
Thompson next, great ! ^^
The M1928A1 could really use some love. I don't think the textures have been touched since EA
Can you do the Thomson next? I don't like the wood on it.
@Jare Small details are what I was going for with the M3, since it was said to be a "cheaper" looking gun.
@Karma & lol123 ϟϟ Thank you :D
@Carl "CJ" Johnson i dont know about you but new players treat me positively, they called me that nice/great guy since i know how to give new players a good time, i teach them here and there, making great and funny moments.