Space Engineers

Space Engineers

(ACI) Sentinel Battlecruiser (CC)
63 条留言
ellur 2023 年 5 月 31 日 下午 12:22 
How do you fix the feeding issue with conveyers?
SevenofThr4wn 2021 年 2 月 18 日 下午 5:11 
What font did you use
Chrisbitz 2021 年 2 月 13 日 上午 8:48 
I've just built this, and loving the detail and effort gone into making it. However as mentioned before, a lot of the conveyors don;'t connect up properly, especially the 3 large containers in engineering, aren't connected to anything! But once fixed, it works great!
boomdude67 2019 年 12 月 5 日 上午 9:48 
yes
♠ Zahltag ♠ 2019 年 10 月 5 日 下午 2:30 
I just noticed your definition of battlecruiser shifted from 6000 to 60.000 blocks over time xD
Interstellar Pi 2018 年 12 月 18 日 下午 2:29 
Hey you might want to revise the way you feed your supplies throughout the ship just a couple of junctions are missing causing stuff to not get to where the need to go but you do need the fix the problem with the large reactor feed
Catshley 2018 年 5 月 4 日 上午 7:48 
most of the ships on the workshop are trash, but i love this design, fantastic job
Atlas 2017 年 12 月 22 日 上午 8:07 
AND AWESOME
k_medlock  [作者] 2017 年 12 月 22 日 上午 1:54 
Yeah... My ships tend to be quite wide...
Rhea.licious 2017 年 12 月 21 日 下午 11:20 
This thing is so huge that is exactly as wide as my frigate is long!
k_medlock  [作者] 2017 年 10 月 29 日 上午 2:12 
@All Fixed thrusters due to recent update.
M0narch 2017 年 9 月 27 日 下午 3:47 
Just for your next ship, the fact that I can't get beck into the ship from the hanger once teh hanger is depressurized kind of bugs me, so next time I suggest to just make a airlock to fix that.
Larry 2017 年 9 月 16 日 下午 9:43 
Does anyone else thing they should add like big naval guns to the base game instead of having to get the mod
Atlas 2017 年 9 月 16 日 上午 11:37 
Thats a game bug
TenTwoFour 2017 年 9 月 16 日 上午 11:23 
I have a problem with crashing it into planets. Whenever I crash it, it will either get stuck in the ground and spin wildly, or bounce back 500m into the air, as it were made of rubber.
Serža 2017 年 9 月 16 日 上午 12:56 
Looks really really similiar to one older ship
Rhea.licious 2017 年 9 月 15 日 下午 10:31 
That hangar is in a similar position to where I want my decoy canon
Rhea.licious 2017 年 9 月 15 日 下午 8:24 
Wow.
Tangent 2017 年 9 月 15 日 下午 5:45 
Love the wedge-on-a-wedge design.
k_medlock  [作者] 2017 年 9 月 15 日 上午 5:18 
@Quartofel Thanks mate! Yeah neat idea but i have no idea how to make a scenario haha... Like a scenario where you would pilot a fighter or bomber of sorts... But as said i havr no idea how to make those...
Quartofel 2017 年 9 月 15 日 上午 2:47 
Quality stuff, as always. Would make a great boss fight in some champaign :D
k_medlock  [作者] 2017 年 9 月 13 日 下午 3:35 
@Coffee and Cold Weather Thank you very much! Hmm great question, but i really do not know... 50h maybe... probably a bit less
Sath 2017 年 9 月 13 日 下午 2:35 
Great design, how many hours do you think you put into this one?
k_medlock  [作者] 2017 年 9 月 13 日 上午 9:51 
@Zues Thanks mate! Great idea btw! :D
Zues 2017 年 9 月 13 日 上午 6:59 
lover your designs you aught to upload a world that has like at least one of each of your ships just for a quick look at all in one place. Keep up the great work
k_medlock  [作者] 2017 年 9 月 13 日 上午 4:42 
@Supercx2 Couldn't have said it any better!
M0narch 2017 年 9 月 13 日 上午 4:10 
@Kleadron You better hope that was sincerely a joke. He doesn't want to make his workshop items look like they came from a 5 year old who can't use thumbnail art.
k_medlock  [作者] 2017 年 9 月 12 日 下午 11:08 
@Kleadron No it's not being desperate for subs, I just like presenting my work in an appealing way.
Nosta99 2017 年 9 月 12 日 下午 9:35 
whoa *.*
Kleadron 2017 年 9 月 12 日 下午 9:01 
When you are so desperate for subs that you will put in cool pictures and animated headings
arse combat industries
k_medlock  [作者] 2017 年 9 月 12 日 上午 8:10 
@wolverind Haha alright haha
Afgooey 2017 年 9 月 12 日 上午 8:08 
@medlock Don't worry that's for the after battle, i'd say the vistigal would be a fair fight
k_medlock  [作者] 2017 年 9 月 12 日 上午 7:49 
@wolverind Ok... Woah didn't think you were gonna go with the Titan... Would be an interesting battle though ;)
Afgooey 2017 年 9 月 12 日 上午 7:33 
@k_medlock I'll challenge it :), and bring along my mangalore haha
k_medlock  [作者] 2017 年 9 月 12 日 上午 6:56 
@Dying Dark Star Haha glad to hear that! :D

@wolverind So you dare challenge the Sentinel wolverind? ^^
Afgooey 2017 年 9 月 12 日 上午 6:23 
looks amazing med! Can't wait to battle it ;)
Dying Dark Star 2017 年 9 月 12 日 上午 6:08 
another sexy ship the detail is amazing inside and out.
k_medlock  [作者] 2017 年 9 月 11 日 下午 9:23 
@mattwv02 Changed that. Thanks!

@Chief Engineer Caswell Wow not at all what i had expected but i see why that is... Thanks for testing that! Like he said bring a buddy Sentinel Captains! :D

@Supercx2 I decided against a gravity shield because of the sheer amount of point defense and because it would severely mess with the mass driver...

M0narch 2017 年 9 月 11 日 下午 8:07 
Also, medlock there is no gravity shield, but I assume that is due to the number of point defense, right?
Shrouded Soul 2017 年 9 月 11 日 下午 6:25 
(part 1)

Just ran that broadside test, the Ascendancy won.

Sentinal: complete destruction, no functioning systems.

Ascendancy: Substantial localized hull damage, functioning control and sublight maneuvering systems, functioning assemblers and refinery, limited FTL could be restored relativly easily.
Shrouded Soul 2017 年 9 月 11 日 下午 6:25 
(part 2)

The only chance the Sentinal has is ambushing the Ascendancy from long range with its gravity cannon.

Both ships carry fighter craft, but the Ascendancy can carry more of its outdated craft, it seems, than the Sentinal has modern fighters to account for. The Sentinal's point-defence would make a fighter attack dangerous, so the Ascendancy would probably keep its fighters on defense.
While possesing fewer weapons, the Ascendancy's sheer mass allows it to outlast the Sentinal close in, and thanks to its gravity shield, thats probably where the battle would have to be fought.
the decoy systems on both ships would be a moot point as they both have them, and the sheer amount of fire power would make the time the turrets are destracted almost nothing.

My advice to Sentinal captains, bring a buddy.
M0narch 2017 年 9 月 11 日 下午 5:37 
I mean, it does make it significantly harder to dock so I'll most likely take one out though.
mattwv02 2017 年 9 月 11 日 下午 4:19 
Missing a block count in description?
k_medlock  [作者] 2017 年 9 月 11 日 下午 2:35 
@Supercx2 Oh wow didnt think that was possible but good to know! :D
M0narch 2017 年 9 月 11 日 下午 2:04 
I actually was able to get 3 renegade and one wildfire, just had to squeeze one end of a renegade a bit.
k_medlock  [作者] 2017 年 9 月 11 日 下午 1:44 
@Chief Engineer Caswell Yeah the Sentinel might be victorious in a one on one engagement.

Sorry about the repetitivness... This is an older hull.

I will definitely consider a twin hull. Thanks for the advice
k_medlock  [作者] 2017 年 9 月 11 日 下午 1:40 
@Supercx2 Alright so fighter setup as following:
- 4 Renegade Fighter Bombers
- 3 Raptor Superiority Fighters
- 2 Raptor/Renegade and 1 Wildfire Heavy Fighter
- 5 Nightshade Bombers

Be careful when launching fighters. The hanger can get very cramped and therefore, you should first fly downward before flying forward. Doing so makes sure that the engine burst does not burn away parts of a other strike craft.
Shrouded Soul 2017 年 9 月 11 日 下午 12:11 
Okay, now I'm gonna have to see how this actually does versus the Ascendancy. I'm betting its only advantage in an unpiloted broadside battle will be anti-misslie point defence, but who knows.

Looks great as usual, If a tad repetative considering your other ships.

Ever consider a twin hull of sorts? Might make a good large carrier with the door in the middle and a point to either side.
M0narch 2017 年 9 月 11 日 下午 12:08 
Because I'm indecisive, could I get a recommendation for what fighters to use(the exact number of them and exact models)?
k_medlock  [作者] 2017 年 9 月 11 日 上午 11:58 
@Supercx2 Haha glad to hear that! Ascendancy will get a refit sometime though!

@budgie Oh i feel you man...

@Son o'Petrified Haha thanks! :D