Stellaris

Stellaris

Mechanical Revolution
36 条留言
Argual  [作者] 2018 年 12 月 21 日 上午 10:06 
Sorry im pretty busy at the moment, i did not work on mods for a while now. If someone wants to they have my permission to update the mod, provided they ask me and add me as co-creator.
Oblivious 2018 年 12 月 9 日 上午 8:22 
Do you mind updating to 2.2?
Argual  [作者] 2018 年 2 月 24 日 上午 1:13 
Updated to 2.0, made some balance changes (Robots now get +30% RP, so they effectively have +10%). Reduced Robot Build Speed to +100%, +200% was too strong early, had little impact late game. Pop growth speed reduced by 50%, to encourage robot building over pops.
Argual  [作者] 2017 年 12 月 11 日 上午 10:21 
Mostly you will have a slower research point generation, but you can offset that by traits.
Argual  [作者] 2017 年 12 月 11 日 上午 10:19 
Yes. All pop output. You will have to rely on expanding and building robots almost everywhere, until the robots are advanced enough to be put on research labs. (As robots do not suffer from the penalties, -20% to all pops but +20% to robots.
marky612 2017 年 12 月 10 日 上午 9:31 
It also effects pop food production?
Argual  [作者] 2017 年 12 月 9 日 上午 5:36 
Update: Now also gives Robomodding.
marky612 2017 年 10 月 18 日 下午 3:59 
I know of that one, I more meant one that focuses on increased building speed. Maybe like have a new civic where its basically a production line that's gone into overdrive. I hate how slow machine empires build, and this civic can't be used for them.
Argual  [作者] 2017 年 10 月 18 日 上午 10:05 
marky612 2017 年 10 月 17 日 下午 3:38 
Will you be making a similar civic for machine empires?
Socca 2017 年 9 月 27 日 上午 1:56 
Works now. Thanks again!
LordZ 2017 年 9 月 26 日 下午 2:20 
o-o *reads comments* i hope i get the 200% build speed D=
LordZ 2017 年 9 月 26 日 下午 2:20 
robot build speed 200% THANK YOU

this will work wonders with the crappy build speed synthetic dawn has.

seriously paradox? 100 minerals PER pop? and they grow way slower than organics? (and not you know the other way around).

the machine empire/race thing has kinda fallen flat on its face for me, too slow to grow and expand without mods. =p
Argual  [作者] 2017 年 9 月 26 日 上午 8:58 
Can you check it now? It should work.
Socca 2017 年 9 月 26 日 上午 8:41 
Sorry to bother you again, but I am not getting the Robot build speed bonus of 200%, but all the the other factors of your mod apply.
http://psteamcommunity.yuanyoumao.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1147793583 here is a screenshot. Just your mod is active.
Argual  [作者] 2017 年 9 月 26 日 上午 8:03 
:D
Socca 2017 年 9 月 25 日 上午 11:23 
in other news: Im blind.

Will try that out, again, thank you!
Argual  [作者] 2017 年 9 月 25 日 上午 11:19 
stated*
Argual  [作者] 2017 年 9 月 25 日 上午 11:19 
It is staded on the preview image (fanatic materialist and mechanist required)
Socca 2017 年 9 月 25 日 上午 10:54 
aaah alright, nevermind then, was just unclear since it wasnt stated anywhere. Thank you.
Argual  [作者] 2017 年 9 月 24 日 下午 11:27 
It works for me. Remember, you must be Fanatic Materialist and have the Mechanist civic selected already. And it won't show up for Machine Intelligence, that is intended.
Socca 2017 年 9 月 24 日 下午 4:19 
This does not show up in the civics select screen. Neither as Machine Intelligence nor as a normal Empire

Your Growing pods mod on the other hand does.
76561198148577520 2017 年 9 月 8 日 下午 4:03 
@MinerSebas just use a mod called Stellar Expansion which adds a lot of techs, some of which increase robot resource output
Argual  [作者] 2017 年 9 月 8 日 上午 10:45 
About the 2. question:
In my experience, this is a strong civic. I want it to require huge commitment. This is more of a "feel" reason, not necessarily a rational one. There is some "accepting and moving on" in order here ;)
Argual  [作者] 2017 年 9 月 8 日 上午 10:45 
This is intended. You can negate the mineral penalty (ON PLANETS) by using your robots to mine.

This civic is changing your gameplay, but it won't make it super powerful. You can rapidly make robots, they will gather more resources (except energy and minerals of course). Also, their maintenance is enermously better, when you have a hundred robot pop, it is a huge benefit.

The civic is strong early because you can max out a planet faster, and strong late game because when you get synths, they will get extra 20% unity, research points on top of their vanilla bonuses. Also, you can replace your pops a bit faster. If I remember correctly, droids are almost as good as normal pops at research and unity gathering.

Oh, and ofc you will probably get those techs faster as you get 20% faster industry research.

Well, this textwall here is my logic :)
MinerSebas 2017 年 9 月 8 日 上午 9:51 
Interesting Civic, but two Nitpicks.

1.) The Mineral gains for Robots with this Civic are not stronger (-20% + 20% = 0%). Could you maybe change it, to an overall bonus of 5%?

2.) Could it be possible to change the Requirments, so that you also can take this civic, if you researched Robots?
Argual  [作者] 2017 年 9 月 7 日 上午 10:24 
I didnt take it like that dont worry, I just usually try to solve bugs asap, so I told you and the others who may read to expect a delay :)
Deon ☣ 2017 年 9 月 7 日 上午 10:20 
Oh, one thing I don't want my message to be is to be a "request for immediate response". It was just a hint of what I thought could be improved :). Thank you very much for your dedication to modding and sharing.
Argual  [作者] 2017 年 9 月 7 日 上午 10:17 
Oh lol, sorry, I thought i wrote maintain and you told me to change it to maintenance. Sorry, I just arived from school and my mind is a little tired. I will correct it ASAP, im just not home right now (unversity is far from home) and I don't have the mod files with me. I'll probably do it in a week or two. Thanks again!
Deon ☣ 2017 年 9 月 7 日 上午 10:08 
Maintenance is a noun. Maintain is a verb.

"To construct, maintain and advance" - 3 verbs.
In your description it's "to verb, noun and verb", which doesn't really makes sense from a structure of a sentence. Sorry for being picky ;).
Argual  [作者] 2017 年 9 月 7 日 上午 10:06 
Also thanks! :)
Argual  [作者] 2017 年 9 月 7 日 上午 10:05 
Not a typo, at least i don't think so. Isn't "maintain" the verb and "maintenance" the noun?
Deon ☣ 2017 年 9 月 4 日 上午 9:45 
There's a typo in the description: "to construct, maintain" not "to construct, maintenance".

I look forward to more civics, this is a good trend!
LordZ 2017 年 9 月 1 日 上午 6:15 
so good +w+ dont let this die
wee wee wee wee wee wee wee wee 2017 年 9 月 1 日 上午 1:53 
noice
Guy 2017 年 8 月 31 日 下午 1:05 
looks good.