安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题






This totally gets my thumbs up and favorite, as it makes the game more fair without making anything unbalanced.
[Half my squad gets insta-killed through cover by an enemy MEC and Priest in the same turn]
And here I am again.
So thanks for that man, love ya!
High Cover = Better Defense, but lowered aim.
Half Cover = Better AIm, but light defense.
I am using Advent Advengers New Weapon Range table and would like to tweak the cover values to his reccomended 35/50 cover values. Can I just tweak these values in your mod's XComGameCore.ini file. i.e. +LOW_COVER_BONUS=35 +HIGH_COVER_BONUS=50?
Still favorited and liked <3
If you want you can do it yourself, it's in DefaultGameCore search for UnitHeightDisadvantagePenalty, I have mine set to -15 (And have applied the effects of this mod to LOW_COVER_BONUS & HIGH_COVER_BONUS.
My reason was upping High Cover to 45 makes Height Advantage worse than High Cover, which I don't believe is worth the risk.
i always used your three mods before wotc (cover bonus, more starting soldiers, and flashbang)