安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题






it's from "Capnbubs Accessories Pack - No Expansion"
Please tell me
That said, I can understand your point. Hard to justify human-sized super soldiers when there are mods that already make them, and especially when one looks at the basic roles fulfilled of your Guardsmen mod.
Pointless highschool arguments aside, the biggest problem is how to differentiate between the three when looking at options within xcom. Assault isn't as big of a problem, since they would fill a different role than tac or devs (mobile melee/flanker), but implementing tactical marines would leave a fair bit of overlap with the guardsman, unless they're made as a spark class. Devastators would work better than tacs as a spark class based on abilities and movement, but we'll see.
As far as modeling, I'm basically in the same boat as you. I'd love to do it, but I don't really know how and it'd take me a while to learn.
That said, you're welcome to do what you wanna. Just wondering what would happen. Been kicking around the idea of taking up modeling myself, but due to a lack of know-how, equipment, and...well, basically everything necessary, I'm not able to do so.
Past that, it's unknown. Out of curiousity, what do you consider the three Marine types? If all three can be implemented sufficiently, then I'll probably go for it.