Instal Steam
login
|
bahasa
简体中文 (Tionghoa Sederhana)
繁體中文 (Tionghoa Tradisional)
日本語 (Bahasa Jepang)
한국어 (Bahasa Korea)
ไทย (Bahasa Thai)
Български (Bahasa Bulgaria)
Čeština (Bahasa Ceko)
Dansk (Bahasa Denmark)
Deutsch (Bahasa Jerman)
English (Bahasa Inggris)
Español - España (Bahasa Spanyol - Spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (Bahasa Spanyol - Amerika Latin)
Ελληνικά (Bahasa Yunani)
Français (Bahasa Prancis)
Italiano (Bahasa Italia)
Magyar (Bahasa Hungaria)
Nederlands (Bahasa Belanda)
Norsk (Bahasa Norwegia)
Polski (Bahasa Polandia)
Português (Portugis - Portugal)
Português-Brasil (Bahasa Portugis-Brasil)
Română (Bahasa Rumania)
Русский (Bahasa Rusia)
Suomi (Bahasa Finlandia)
Svenska (Bahasa Swedia)
Türkçe (Bahasa Turki)
Tiếng Việt (Bahasa Vietnam)
Українська (Bahasa Ukraina)
Laporkan kesalahan penerjemahan
Tl;dr I didn't put Fanatic militarist because the military doesn't truly define them as a society, but rather an attraction to the public good. If anything they're fanatic egalitarian, but I chose materialist as the third ethic point to represent their well-roundedness.
Yeah they were really difficult to categorize. They have a very rich and multifaceted culture in Mass effect lore. When I pick out the ethics for these mods though, I'm looking at what defines the culture. For the Turians, my impression from my research is that their biggest value is public order, and what best serves the public good. Everything else stems from that.
For instance, my observation is that even though all their leaders and officials are members of the military, what really attracts them to the army in the first place is the desire to serve the collective.
-They took on the Volus as a client race because they had little interest in the inherently selfish pursuit of wealth that comes with business.
-Their society is a meritocracy- the best rise, and while some few are demoted it's not considered their fault, but rather the person who promoted them beyond their capabilities. Again, public good trumps personal advancement.