安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
奖励
Tl;dr I didn't put Fanatic militarist because the military doesn't truly define them as a society, but rather an attraction to the public good. If anything they're fanatic egalitarian, but I chose materialist as the third ethic point to represent their well-roundedness.
Yeah they were really difficult to categorize. They have a very rich and multifaceted culture in Mass effect lore. When I pick out the ethics for these mods though, I'm looking at what defines the culture. For the Turians, my impression from my research is that their biggest value is public order, and what best serves the public good. Everything else stems from that.
For instance, my observation is that even though all their leaders and officials are members of the military, what really attracts them to the army in the first place is the desire to serve the collective.
-They took on the Volus as a client race because they had little interest in the inherently selfish pursuit of wealth that comes with business.
-Their society is a meritocracy- the best rise, and while some few are demoted it's not considered their fault, but rather the person who promoted them beyond their capabilities. Again, public good trumps personal advancement.