From The Depths

From The Depths

评价数不足
EK-694X 'Bloodhound' Starfighter
   
奖励
收藏
已收藏
取消收藏
文件大小
发表于
77.135 KB
2017 年 5 月 14 日 上午 5:39
1 项改动说明 ( 查看 )

订阅以下载
EK-694X 'Bloodhound' Starfighter

在 Videogames 的 1 个合集中
[Obsolete] Sylvian Paramilitary Supply Corp
163 件物品
描述
EK-694X 'Bloodhound' Starfighter:

Developed offworld by EK Aerospace, the EK-694X is a light exo-atmospheric fighter with a high top speed and relatively long deployment range. Effective in small squadrons, the Bloodhound is commonly used as a space escort and pursuit fighter.


Weapons:
  • x2 Ashens A-53 'Corona' 4,000w optical cannon

Powerplant:
  • x3 Pegasus XIE-135 'Xenon' sub-light thruster
  • 175m/s Top Speed
  • 3,000 Solid Fuel

$16,094 /u

[AI, Paintable]
8 条留言
Videogames  [作者] 2022 年 8 月 13 日 下午 10:32 
Yeah, that sentence easily applies to the game as-a-whole in it's current state.

They added mimics, but outside of that its all in balance & game-mechanic limbo.
G4mma159 2022 年 8 月 13 日 下午 8:23 
Sadly this awesome guy is totally broken now.
LS-Swapped HMT Olympic 2017 年 9 月 9 日 上午 11:44 
There's no such thing as too many E.L.S.A.vehicles!
Videogames  [作者] 2017 年 5 月 15 日 下午 1:26 
Much like the Spearfish or the Robin , its pretty mutch the cheapest thing possible without sacrificing complete functionality.

Its just not that cheap because ion engines themselves are expensive, and the generators required to run them are much larger than most other craft.
Cirdain 2017 年 5 月 15 日 下午 1:22 
Ah, makes sense. Ignore my previous comment, then xD
Videogames  [作者] 2017 年 5 月 15 日 下午 1:21 
That is basically the point, the reason it is so cheap is because its not atmosphere rated.

The Bloodhound carries just enough to keep it from exploding spectacularly, but it's performace is severely limited at low altitude. It's purpose is space escort and pursuit only.

The retrofit of the E-4C Alicorn is going to be a full space-to-surface operator and should meet these expecations. It is a much larger craft so it has room for tertiary systems.
Cirdain 2017 年 5 月 15 日 上午 8:56 
Excellent in theory, but has a terrible time targetting anything below it, and is absolutely useless against surface targets. I would suggest either giving it longer attack runs, so the forward-facing lasers can fire downwards longer, or ventral lasers that can fire downwards
Lexicon 2017 年 5 月 14 日 下午 12:09 
Now a space-borne battleship would be a beautiful idea. Think you could do that?