安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题










While the user is airborne, keep booster=50. A user landing is determined by 7 time units having passed (or possibly when motion=0)
Do not heel when motion=0.
With these modifications I was able to create a solution that passes the tests.
The test does not match the spec. At t=8, motion=63 and distance=10.
According to the spec, if motion>50 and distance <= 10, that means the user is running, thus set booster=100. However, in the test, in this case, booster=50.
Further, at t=9, motion=0 and distance=0.
According to the spec, if motion[t] < motion[t-1] (falling edge), and distance <= 10, then set booster=0. However, in the test, booster=50.
The "small hint" in the description on the workshop should be in the spec, otherwise it's not possible to completely implement the spec.
Further, the spec has references to radar-out and radar-in. They are not on the board. :-)
Here is an implementation of the spec as written: However it is not pass the tests. https://i.imgur.com/k5OhggX.jpg
I'm pretty sure though, that with the "small hint" I can make a different implementation that does pass the tests. :-)