安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题









Or what makes more sense to me is they want to make sure they're on mission 3 so they can play their required card, which makes it a bit harder maybe but wouldn't screw the rest of the players as easily ha
I can't tell which of these three that means: they can only win if they're on mission 3 and play their corresponding card, they win as long as they play 2 of their cards and the 3rd mission results in their favor regardless of if they're on the team for it, or if they win if they only play one card and the 3rd mission fails but have to play another if it passes (and vise versa for the spy sone)
Thanks man
Second off, I could create a scripted version version of this and perhaps a better table (not much of an artist but layouts I can do) if you'd like