商店页面
Space Engineers
全部 讨论 截图 艺术作品 实况直播 视频 创意工坊 新闻 指南 评测

Space Engineers

商店页面
Space Engineers >  创意工坊 > w4stedspace 的创意工坊
33 个评价
Hawk Atmospheric Fighter - Wing Reliant Design
描述 讨论0 留言7 改动说明
   
奖励
收藏
已收藏
取消收藏
Type: Blueprint
文件大小
发表于
263.730 KB
2016 年 2 月 21 日 下午 1:01
1 项改动说明 （ 查看 ）
必需物品
这件物品需要以下所有其它物品
创建者
w4stedspace
离线
查看所有 35 个合集（也许有些被隐藏了）
2,581 不重复访客数
617 当前订阅者
22 当前收藏人数

订阅以下载
Hawk Atmospheric Fighter - Wing Reliant Design

描述
Pretty simple little plane, setup as a light attack craft with 6 gatlings and 2 reloadable rocket launchers. Handles nicely thanks to the large forwards thrust and large wingspan.

HAS NO LANDING GEAR! SEE THE VIDEO FOR WHY AND FEEL FREE TO ADD YOUR OWN :)

Fully survival ready!

Many thanks to Digi for his continued efforts to make amazing mods!

The blueprint to accompany the attached video from my YouTube channel!

Stream: http://www.hitbox.tv/w4stedspace

If you found this interesting or helpful please consider visting my YouTube channel for more Space Engineers tutorials, guides and videos.

http://www.youtube.com/w4stedspace

I also have a Steam group:
just w4sted space
7 条留言
< >
Dovahkiir 2016 年 2 月 29 日 下午 1:55 
W4sted, why not use the mag lock mod as you dont need to touch, go in low and slow enoughto be in proximity and lock, they also dont affect aerodunamics. Awesome design
w4stedspace  [作者] 2016 年 2 月 28 日 上午 10:05 
You only have 3 models of wing to play with so incorporating them can be a bit weird.. in this case though it was an intentional choice, looks more 'plane' like this way I thought. Means the other more crazy ones I make look more different :)
Janixos 2016 年 2 月 26 日 下午 12:20 
Nice fighter :D
I don´t like the way how you dealt with the large Atmospheric thrusters. Wouldn´t it look better, if you integrate them into the wings? It could make a smaller profile. At the end of each wing you could install 3 small Atmo-Thrusters instead of the large ones.

ROFLwafles 2016 年 2 月 25 日 下午 9:53 
Tell me I'm not the only one who read the thumbnail " Hawk as f*** "
Eclipse Tech 2016 年 2 月 22 日 下午 1:10 
I thought this looked familiar, then I looked at who made it... I was not disappointed.
xenolego 2016 年 2 月 21 日 下午 6:07 
Completely wild!
w4stedspace  [作者] 2016 年 2 月 21 日 下午 5:46 
I like that reverse-thinking :) Same sorta approach that led me to this thought! No idea if it'd work, not sure if rotors have enough 'give' in them to absorb the impact