商店页面
Portal 2
全部 讨论 截图 艺术作品 实况直播 视频 创意工坊 新闻 指南 评测
Portal 2 >  创意工坊 > Elenesski 的创意工坊
79 个评价
Crazy - Coop 02 - Too much going back and forth
描述 讨论0 留言11 改动说明
   
奖励
收藏
已收藏
取消收藏
Cooperative
标签： Button, Pedestal Button, Faith Plate, Light Bridge, Laser Field, Fizzler, Cube Button, Goo, Flip Panel, Angled Panel, Tractor Beam, Turret, Laser Emitter, Laser Catcher, Reflector Cube, Reflector Cube Dropper, Stairs, Glass, Grating, Piston Platform, Sphere Button, Edgeless Safety Cube, Edgeless Safety Cube Dropper, Laser Relay
文件大小
发表于
更新日期
11.372 MB
2015 年 6 月 29 日 下午 6:16
2015 年 7 月 7 日 下午 4:36
7 项改动说明 （ 查看 ）
创建者
Elenesski
离线
查看所有由 Elenesski 和其他人创建的 24 个合集（也许有些被隐藏了）
50 不重复访客数
571 当前订阅者
1 当前收藏人数

订阅以下载
Crazy - Coop 02 - Too much going back and forth

在 Elenesski 的 1 个合集中
Crazy Portal 2 Coop Only Levels
40 件物品
描述
You and your buddy will wander through this and move back and forth over the same stuff.
11 条留言
< >
Elenesski  [作者] 2023 年 8 月 6 日 下午 3:53 
This is really evil ... retried the level and it is definitely solvable, but it's REALLY REALLY CRAZY hard ... makes you think a lot!!
Elenesski  [作者] 2017 年 4 月 30 日 上午 10:14 
No disrespect, but I will make my own decisions on how to make my levels; I will take feedback on they liked/disliked the level and decide whether to incorporate suggestions or not. My style is, I like making puzzles that reuse elements, and what you are proposing breaks my style ... and it means I make levels like other people. I want my own style. If this means that I get levels that are played by a small core of people, maybe 30-50, and if 90% liked the level, that's good enough for me. If you don't like puzzles that reuse previously used elements, then you won't like my levels.
ESPF 2017 年 4 月 30 日 上午 9:10 
Nope, just neatly plotted elements that work together, so rather than wandering about matching symbols you (for example) step on a button and a lift IN THAT ROOM moves - simple and practical level design that allows you to create puzzles that make sense but are still hard to solve.
Elenesski  [作者] 2017 年 4 月 27 日 上午 10:51 
I guess you'd rather have a zillion nearly untraceable antlines over a set of signs that tells you exactly where the X affects Y.
ESPF 2017 年 4 月 27 日 上午 3:51 
True, people can like what they will, but I don't consider a level where you can't see what effect you're having in one room, forcing you to wander about and keep checking if anything's changed. That makes the level irritating, but not difficult. We've played plenty of levels where the challenge is in the puzzles themselves, not in the walking about. If I wanted to play a walking simulator there are plenty of other games where I can do so!
Elenesski  [作者] 2017 年 4 月 26 日 下午 4:25 
Or maybe they know how to give a thumbs up when they they are totally challenged and succeed in a difficult level.
ESPF 2017 年 4 月 26 日 下午 3:20 
Why did Americans vote in Trump? People are stupid.
Elenesski  [作者] 2017 年 4 月 26 日 上午 7:11 
If that's true why do 90% of the people who play it like it?
ESPF 2017 年 4 月 26 日 上午 4:29 
A good puzzle is one where you can see what you have to do, but need to work out how to do it. A BAD puzzle is like this one, where you can't see what effect, if any, you are having on the rest of the level. This is such awful level design, in my view.
Anonysaurus 2015 年 12 月 12 日 下午 12:05 
> You and your buddy will wander through this and move back and forth over the same stuff
*laugh*
Okay now, this one was even harder, than the last one, these rooms are just really epic, thank you!