安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题









https://psteamcommunity.yuanyoumao.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=489636701
Using this metric, A 200MVA boiler would have an upkeep of $2.1 million per week. A 1000:1 converstion to CS currency makes it about 2100 per week. For water usage, enthalpy of vaporization (to get liquid water to boil, pressurize, and do work) -- about 3 cubic meters per kwh, or about 100,000 cubic meters per week for a 200MVA boiler, which, interestingly, is about one pumping station.
One dedicated pumping station to supply a 200MVA coal-fired boiler, except that boiling water to make steam put a turbine in motion is inherently inefficient. So figure three pumping stations.
FWIW, 99% of the water used goes right back in the river just as clean as it was (maybe cleaner). The rest goes out the cooling towers, much of which falls as rain or snow and (surprise) also winds up back in the river where it came from.
For reference, the Colorado river inflow to lake mead averages about 20,000 cfs. The Ohio river at Cairo, Illinois discharges about 250,000 cfs into the Mississippi.