安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题











By worse, it means the Data Angels can still screw up and be Identified. The way the code works is that any case of undetection is changed to detected. Any case of killed is changed to identified.
That's just kind of stupid. Also, it says "or worse". If they can't be killed does that mean there is a higher chance of operation failure?
In either scenario, what do u think about giving Cinder some kind of reverese engeneering ability as well. Ex: reduced tech cost if tech has been researched by anyone / increased tech speed if tech has been researched by a civ u r spying on.
PS: probably gonna play Cinder in next game.
PSS: One city challenge with Aki is the most civ fun ive had in years, ty.