安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
奖励
Whilst the portrait orientation of a YT short is good in focusing the viewer's attention, I am finding hard to read the unit labels as I am not familiar with the NATO symbology.
I think this is because YT shorts naturally run at lower resolution than their standard videos.
So, the intent of the comment was not to express a preference to a particular orientation, more that the presentation and clarity of the content could be improved if you choose to make additional content in the future.
PS I'm viewing it on my desktop monitor (27" @ 1440) and not my mobile device.
Just my opinion at the end of the day, also I commented on your artillery short -> There's a fundamental difference between cover and concealment. Great guide nonetheless. Looking forward to seeing more videos too - get into the details of why they should use these tactics you speak of instead of just touching on what they can do
These were designed as short duration videos to target a wider audience. I could possibly string them together, or do a landscape in the future for folks who prefer it.
Though, it would have a greater impact if the videos were re-rendered to landscape orientation rather than a portrait which is a default for a YT Short video.
Good job anyway