商店页面

Cosmoteer: 星舰设计师

全部讨论截图艺术作品实况直播视频创意工坊新闻指南评测

Cosmoteer: Starship Architect & Commander > 创意工坊 > RustyDios 的创意工坊

评价数不足

Adaptive Heat Exchanger

描述讨论0 留言9 改动说明

奖励

标签： Mods

文件大小

发表于

更新日期

3.802 MB

8 月 17 日上午 4:54

11 月 5 日下午 4:09

4 项改动说明（查看）

2,896	不重复访客数
1,326	当前订阅者
69	当前收藏人数

订阅以下载
Adaptive Heat Exchanger

已订阅

取消订阅

描述

What is this?

Gives you an adaptive 4-way heat exchanger and an extended range version.

The adaptive version costs slightly more than the vanilla stub piece but works slightly worse. This is because it can utilise in-pipe placements. It has a range of 5 (same as vanilla stub) but can not be placed within 2 tiles of other Adaptive Exchangers (it can still be placed next to vanilla stubs!)

The extended range version costs HyperCoils to make but works slightly better. This is because it can utilise in-pipe placements, but as it gathers heat from more sources it need to be more efficient to continue processing heat at roughly the same rate!. It has a range of 8 but can not be placed within 4 tiles of other Adaptive Exchangers (it can still be placed next to vanilla stubs!)

All career and build and battle unlocked when normal heat exchangers are.
The mod does not alter the vanilla stub exchanger in any way.

~~ Confirmed working post MELTDOWN update 0.30 ~~

Would be a bit hard for a part introduced for function in Meltdown to not be Meltdown compliant!

Credits

Many thanks to MrCloista for the mod suggestion

~ Enjoy !! and please buy me a Cuppa Tea[buymeacoffee.com].

9 条留言

< >

RustyDios [作者] 11 月 14 日下午 12:07

I don't have the older versions anymore, sorry.

Jdawg 11 月 14 日上午 11:48

Any chance you would mind making the older versions (specifically v2.2) available for download for people playing on 0.30.1?

RustyDios [作者] 9 月 1 日下午 11:16

Cool Ideas. I did play around with a larger 2x2 heat exchanger but didn't really find it had any better use than 4 adaptive ones
... although that was before I put the restrictions on proximity in ...

IronOnyx 9 月 1 日下午 10:41

I have a suggestion to improve things a little, why not add an additional 2 heat exchangers that cost more in terms of materials but can absorb more heat (increased from 900MJ/s to 1,500MJ/s), 1 for each size. Would be nice. If not, you could at least increase the amount of heat that the larger one absorbs as 900 for a much larger area does not seem all that good even though the efficiency is increased.