安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题









As for disproportionate, I personally enable both mods the same time so kinda alleviate that problem. Imo both will be better than using only one.
If I ever make a more precise mod (or to answer your question of "best"), I would probably use a weighted combination of (monthly income of the entire realm, monthly income of the top liege, realm size, tier and maybe amount of direct vassals and even their contracts) to decide the benefit of the modifiers. But when I made the mod, I first only considered the ranks, and then size (similar to your example, a big and small empire should be different) come to me soon after.
And Hi @archon_silverius, thanks for your questions! I'm not sure what your question is? the formula for 'ranked' is the rank obviously? with each rank giving a different modifier. As for the 'sized', it's realm size 5, 10, 25 etc. You can look at them in the scripted effects and modifiers of each mod if you are interested. There's not a formula per se, but 'if' conditions.