安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题










What did romans is secure those roads with little engineering marvels, crossing mountain paths or marshes,
After reading your post yesterday I did a bit of research on it myself, what you're talking about is related to an archaealogical discovery in Spain where they found an example of a road that did that which has started discussion as to whether or not they were all covered in gravel. On various platforms people have talked about it and no one can say for sure whether or not they were all layered with gravel or if some were and some weren't. Some argue that not all of them were, as some types of stone can be shaved down and layered perfectly close to not cause large cracks which could cause issues for travellers if not layered properly (most importantly messengers, who had to go the fastest).
All the stone roads you see nowdays are recent "reproductions" and not historical accurate.
Sorry to say that.
Anyway is not that important because it do not changes really the game mechanics.