商店页面
Sea Power
全部 讨论 截图 艺术作品 实况直播 视频 创意工坊 新闻 指南 评测

Sea Power

商店页面
Sea Power >  创意工坊 > Mitchell600 的创意工坊
评价数不足
BBG Kentucky
描述 讨论0 留言5 改动说明
   
奖励
收藏
已收藏
取消收藏
文件大小
发表于
更新日期
2.095 MB
2024 年 12 月 26 日 上午 7:54
8 月 2 日 下午 1:24
3 项改动说明 （ 查看 ）
创建者
Mitchell600
离线
查看所有 102 个合集（也许有些被隐藏了）
1,608 不重复访客数
287 当前订阅者
33 当前收藏人数

订阅以下载
BBG Kentucky

描述
Kentucky Class BBG has a Talos Mk7 launcher instead of the usual 16"tripple turret on the back of the ship
5 条留言
< >
Decadence 6 月 1 日 下午 4:45 
Texture at the rear is a little messed up.
FrenchName 1 月 20 日 上午 8:53 
Terran is correct on this, I would further stress that the Montanas were ditched because of Carriers period. Flat tops were prioritized capitol ships between 1940 and 1945. US shipyards built some 151 (completed) and about a couple dozen more under construction by the end of 45.
We got 2 North Carolinas by the time Pearl was destroyed 4 Dakotas shortly after, and soon after that 4 Iowas for fast fleet escort, A role the battleships inherited from cruisers to force relevance. The Montanas didn't stand a chance.
TerranRanger 2024 年 12 月 28 日 上午 9:10 
Montanas weren't replacing the Iowas, they were supposed to work together. Iowas were the fast part of the fleet and the Montanas the heavy firepower. Basically battlecruisers and battleships from WWI fleet tactics. When aircraft carriers emerged as the future of naval power the Montanas were ditched because their 28 knot speed couldn't keep pace with the carriers while the Iowas 33 knot speed kept pace to let them defend carriers even at flank speed.
iceman18 2024 年 12 月 27 日 下午 3:12 
should look up the Montana Class BB that were about to replace the Iowa's
Yaivenov 2024 年 12 月 26 日 下午 5:38 
That's a very slick looking mash up. Hypothetical Vietnam era refit? (60's)