安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题











- Streetfighter 2
- Black Night
- KFOR (2f with dozer blade on the front)
- Challenger 2 TES (Without era, so the baz plate behind is showing. they are often used like this overseas for training)
- Challenger 2 Driver Training Vehicle (custom made turret section for inspectors to view driving)
- Challenger 2 UKR (ukrainian modification to the vehicle, with cage armour welded on)
- Challenger 2 LEP (Life extention program made by RBSL, later known as Challenger 3 (P) )
- Trojan (Armored bridge layer)
- Titan (Combat engineering vehicle)
- CRARRV (armoured repair and recovery vehicle)
I test and build my vehicles around Vanilla values to ensure its balanced, i also do two mods, Aegis & CUP,
This is because i can say both of them that also add new vehicles build around similar core values based on vanilla, so yes, they should be well balanced!
My Patrons are also given early access generally for a few weeks to do balancing and bug testing too.
I'm Leary about mod vehicles that don't explicitly say that because some end up being OP AF compared to all other vehicles.