安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题













Do you mind have a look? Thanks!
That is my personal response to your "Why" question, but if you really want that much research and tech content, you could ask Fabilie (the Author) to create an expanded version of this mod that goes on for many more years, and if they want to, have time to, and have a good reason to do so, they will probably do that expansion, but again, im just saying what I personally think here, I dont talk on behalf of the Author, Fabilie, you should talk to him directly about something so complicated as change in the mod's content.
That is an artifact of modded designers from what I've found. Vanilla starting designs don't always fit with the new designers, especially if the structure of the designer is changed and module restrictions are moved around in it. Take Germany: its naval bomber is normally fine, but with the designers here it has the float module in the wrong place and it needs to be moved to the landing gear slot and something added to validate the design, or a new naval bomber designed to take its place. its a pain, yes, but unfortunately the cost of having more in depth designers like this.