安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
Maybe instead, make the requirements scale so that it costs more prestige the higher rank the character is, but prohibitively more gold the lower rank they are.
Therefore I would go along with you on that maybe only certain characters with certain traits such as ambitious/greedy/brave/strong/quick/genius etc would be able to reinforce their claims. OR if they're strong enough, say that they could match said titles army forces or with the help of allies etc.
Also as you say, it should be a prestige lock so not every tom dick and harry can do it. Maybe exalted among men?
What do you all think would be the best way for AI to take it? Should ambitious characters do it? Only those with a certain rank/prestige? Or just any time they can do it?
Would be sick if the AI also could do this, so we would have more wars and drama over the years in our playthroughs.
I always look for more ways to make the AI stay a threat, but I do like the idea of rivarlies over generations forming, even if it is between AI powers.