安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
奖励
I believe this is actually in-line with the fact that stations are a little under-powered by the end-game; perhaps the easiest solution is just to split the difference, and buff the tiers by 200%? This way, you're at least at the equivalent of old "Tier 3" after 80 turns, and now have a new tier to look forward to after your second 80-turn round.
To @wildlifeluvr, I don't see how forcing the user to click something every 25 turns makes it more strategic in any way. I'd love to have auto-management options like we do in cities: "maximize money", "maximize science" and "trade with this city until I come change it." The flexibility is there to micromanage if you want to, just like it is with choosing which tiles a city works. I don't need a pop-up every other turn asking me to re-choose the tiles that some city works, which is exactly what we get now.
Absent something like this, what I really want is for trade routes to not be part of the game at all. As far as I can tell nobody likes them, but you sadly can't ignore them. A decent management UI, with automation and no forced re-choosing would make them good enough.