安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
奖励
This mod simply uses vanilla models when zoomed out far and requires the main mod otherwise it does nothing.
The result in a pop in appearance as shown in the videos.
You only need one of them, and they are both completely optional with respect to the main mod. The desired performance patch will default to the correct load order. If you end up subscribing to both patches at the same time, performance++ will take priority.
I don't have a good way of quantifying performance, but I will add some screenshots of what it looks like when the low-poly assets are used. I simply put this together as my best attempt at allowing everyone to enjoy the mod.
Great idea!
Either that or maybe some kind of bench mark in (very rough estimated) % of performance increase when using this versus the other versions could also be very helpful
Of course, somebody from the community could also provide that info. It might actually be better evaluated by a player with a total potato PC (which I assume you don't have).... if you understand what I mean? <3