安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题










I'm using a 7800X3D with a 3060TI, and by reducing a few settings it did help a bit, specially close to asteroid belts, but if I pause the game my fps skyrocket to max immediatly, so definetly a CPU problem.
Theres not really much I can do other then reducing the number of allowed modules to vanilla levels, and with the better ai scripts they will just build even more stations which will increase the background processing to even higher levels since having less numbers of stations is better then a lot of little ones on the processing
The "extra" connectors need to be there just bc the AI will just build stations completely detatched from the main station floating around if they aren't included, so we could reduce the level there by just accepting ugly stations
i typically get like 40-50 fps in those sectors even with stations/traders around, having a large battle around is when I see sub 20 fps and I have a pretty "average" build for this point in the gaming industry - 2070 Super/ I9 9900K Mods I use are in the "My Mod list" at the top here that I use
I do note that I'm using KUDA AI, so that might get a bet skewed. But I'm playing on a new game, and my FPS is already at 20~30 in those sectors, making it completely unplayable.