安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题










I appreciate the heads up. I'll get it added to the list.
@ThatOneBloke
My thoughts on a patch for Intimacy have been posted in this very discussion. Anyone is welcome to try their hand at it. It's not something I play with, so I don't patch for it. I'm a hobbyist with finite time, so I have to draw clear lines for what work I am willing to do. Patches are non-trivial code additions that require an understanding of three code bases. HAR compatibility practically required a rewrite. (Again, thanks a tonne to Zomuro for helping there) On top of that I spent weeks tracking down weird behaviour between the two.
What this mod does seems simple. Even being a single gene, it's not. It breaks fundamental assumptions of how pregnancy works, and anyone that adds a custom path to or through pregnancy and its surrounding fertility checks will potentially clash with this mod.
RIP half an hour of debugging...
One thing I'd love is being able to fertilize own ovums by hermaphrodite pawns tho. How it works now is you need to extract ovum from female, and fertilize with male. A hermaphrodite female can't fertilize her own ovum, but another hermaphrodite female can. A niche issue tho.
It's actually rather hard to add incompatibilities via xml just by how it's used. there would have to be several naming collisions.