安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题









I have a balancing or consistency question. M4 and AKSU are SMGs, so they recover half of free move AP after firing with GBO. It makes them powerful: quick firing, high penetration, free move. However, similar weapons introduced by MoW are ARs, including M4A1 (HK416C is the only exception). So M4 seems to be better than M4A1, which is strange and should be fixed I think. What about converting some MoW ARs to SMGs, e.g. M4A1, Carbine 723, A12K, A15K? Or, on the contrary, what about converting M4, AKSU, HK416C to AR to keep consistency? (They are not SMGs actually.)
Playing with just vanilla weapons gives you all tactical options you need so it is up to you if you want to see more variety.
How are the experiences with MoW together with ToG?
Could it be to complex or overwhelming for beginners? Are there may overlaps or do they complement each other well?
Thank you for any tipps!